Saturday, November 3, 2007

The Founding Fathers nightmare realized.

Our Founding Fathers fear after writing
the Bill of Rights.

Ignoring the warnings of Benjamin Franklin
and Thomas Jefferson. Most Americans become
apathetic In regards to Rights
and Civil Liberties, opting
Instead for the false safety
of a police state.

The false terror attack of 9-11
was staged to portray an
Islamic attack on America. When
In fact the State was behind It as a
coup de tate to consolidate
more power.

The World trade towers were the
first modern buildings In history to
"collapse" due to jet fuel. But this cover
story Is weak when you study
the facts. It's funny that
when they collapsed It looked
more like a controlled demolition,
than from melting due to
the temperature of jet
fuel burning.

King George the 1st: wasted no time In taking away
our liberties. He capitalized on a conditioned 24/7
news viewing populace, scaring them Into a
frenzied state. They were ready to agree with
anything Bush ordered without
question. Enter the PATRIOT ACT
and the death of the Bill of Rights.

The World also gets to share In the
madness ! King George with all
of the unqestioned power he now holds, seeks
to attack any sovereign Nation
that dares oppose his Empire !

A man who holds unquestioned power, but Is obviously
lacking In Intelligence ! Be afraid, very afraid !

King George I: In an Important
planning stage.

King George only cares about the Lobbyists
and Globalist Corporations, Not the American
people ! Wars of profit for the Military Industrial
complex and big oil, tax breaks for
the wealthy elite and a police state that
feeds the prison Industry= Big $$$

His attitude Is universal amongst all American
politicians. It used to be "We the people", but
Bush and the rest of the despots make It
quite clear In their arrogance, that to them
the people do not matter.

Now the freedom of speech to
protest is confined to "Free
speech zones". Basically cages that
look like dog kennels, Defy the
Imperial police state and you
might be shot.

America does not tolerate dissent, yet we have the
majority of people still asleep thinking we have
a Democracy.

Those of us who oppose the State now
risk being classified as "Terrorists", and
risk being detained without legal
counsel and Imprisonment for Indefinite
lengths. And they say Cubans are denied
freedom on the Island of Cuba. Castro
has nothing on Guantanamo, the
most oppressive piece of (U.S. occupied)
Cuban soil.

Friday, November 2, 2007

The facade of American free elections.

Will secret clubs pick next prez?
CFR, Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission
insiders usually
run for, win White House, shows
new book

Posted: November 1, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2007

WASHINGTON – It started in 1952.

Nearly every person elected as president of the United States
since then – and nearly every opponent – has belonged to a
secretive, globalism-oriented organization known as the
Council on Foreign Relations.

Some presidents and their challengers have belonged
to additional clubs of internationalists – the Bilderberg
Group and the Trilateral Commission. Running mates,
too, more often than not have had ties to the groups.

That the groups exert enormous influence on public
policy is indisputable. What is disputed is whether
such groups are, as adherents and members argue, just
discussion forums for movers and shakers, or, as critics
have long alleged, secret societies shaping a new world
order from behind the scenes. On that last point at
least, no one could challenge the critics: All these
groups operate in considerable secrecy, away
from the scrutiny of the American public.

Regardless of how one characterizes them, the fact
that virtually all presidents belong to the same
secret clubs prompts the author of a new book
to wonder if the 2008 election will also be a contest
between globalist insiders. Judging from the list of
frontrunners of each party, Daniel Estulin, author
of "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group," may
be on to something.

According to a variety of sources, the following
presidential candidates are either members of one
of the groups or have strong ties: Hillary Rodham
Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Barack
Obama, John McCain, John Edwards, Fred
Thompson, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson.

Mike Huckabee, though not a member, spoke to the
CFR in September. Since then, his political star has
risen to the point that he has become a top-tier candidate.

So often throughout recent history it has
been the case.

Ever since Democrat Adlai Stevenson challenged
Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952 and
1956, the odds have significantly favored those
with membership in the elite groups.

In 1960, both John F. Kennedy and Richard M.
Nixon were members.

In 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson was not
a member. Neither was his opponent, Barry
Goldwater. But Johnson had already staffed
his administration with plenty of insiders.

In 1968, it was Nixon versus club member
Hubert H. Humphrey.

In 1972, it was Nixon again against Democratic
Party CFR member George McGovern.

In 1976, it was CFR Republican Gerald Ford
losing to CFR Democrat Jimmy Carter.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan was not a member, but
his running mate, George H.W. Bush, was. So
were both of his opponents – Carter and
independent John Anderson. Assuming
office, however, Reagan quickly named
313 CFR members to his team.

In 1984, another CFR member, Walter Mondale,
was nominated by the Democratic Party to
challenge Reagan.

In 1988, CFR member Bush took on
CFR member Michael Dukakis.

In 1992, Bush was challenged by an obscure governor
from Arkansas, Bill Clinton, who won the "trifecta" by
being a member of the CFR, Trlateral Commission
and Bilderberg Group. He was also a Rhodes
scholar – another favored credential of the
worldwide elite.

In 1996, Clinton was challenged by CFR
member Bob Dole.

In 2000, CFR member Al Gore ran against
non-member George W. Bush, but his
running mate, Dick Cheney, was.

In 2004, Bush was challenged by CFR
member John Kerry.

"David Rockefeller, whose family financed the
CFR, is a common denominator among these parallel
groups," writes Estulin. "Not only is he the CFR
chairman emeritus, but he also continues to
provide financial and personal support to the
TC, CFR and Bilderberg Group."

What is the agenda behind these groups, which
Estulin says are comprised of "self-interested elitists
protecting their wealth and the investments of
multinational banks and corporations in the growing
world economy at the expense of developing nations
and Third World countries"?

"The policies they develop," he writes, "benefit them
as well as move us towards a one-world government."

Those questioning Estulin's conclusion as mere
speculation need only recall organizational financer
David Rockefeller's own words as recorded in
his "Memoirs."

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working
against the best interests of the United States,
characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists'
and conspiring with others around the world to build a
more integrated global political and economic structure –
one world, if you will," he wrote. "If that's the charge,
I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

With regard to insider roles in recent U.S. presidential
races, two of the most interesting were 1976 and 1992.

"In the spring of 1972, a high-profile group of men
gathered for dinner with W. Averell Harriman, the
grand old man of the Democratic Party, a Bilderberger
and a member of the CFR," writes Estulin. "Also
present were Milton Katz, a CFR member and
director of international studies at Harvard, Robert
Bowie, who would later become deputy director of
the CIA, George Franklin, David Rockefeller's
coordinator for the Trilateral Commission, and
Gerald Smith, U.S. ambassador-at-large for non-
proliferation matters. The focus of their discussion
was the not-too-distant 1976 presidential
elections. Harriman suggested that if the Democrats
wanted to recapture the White House, "we had better
get off our high horses and look at some of those
southern governors." Several names cropped
up. Among them were Ruben Askew, governor
of Florida, and Terry Sanford, former governor
of North Carolina and, at the time, president
of Duke University."

Katz reportedly informed David Rockefeller of
the viability of Jimmy Carter, then governor of
Georgia. According to the author, he could be
sold politically to the American people. At a
dinner in London, recorded by the London Times,
Rockefeller got acquainted with Carter and became
convinced he could become the next U.S.
president. Carter was invited to join the
Trilateral Commission and quickly accepted.

Later, U.S. News and World Report would have this
to say about the Carter administration: "The Trilateralists
have taken charge of foreign policy-making in the
Carter administration, and already the immense
power they wield is sparking some controversy. Active
or former members of the Trilateral Commission now
head every key agency involved in mapping U.S.
strategy for dealing with the rest of the world."

In 1992, Estulin concludes Bill Clinton was similarly
"anointed" for the presidency at the 1991 Bilderberg
Conference in Baden-Baden. Following the meeting,
Clinton immediately took a trip to Russia to meet
with Soviet Interior Minister Vadim Balatin, then
serving Mikhail Gorbachev. Later, when Boris Yeltsin
won the presidential election, Bakatin became the
new chief of the KGB.

The meeting went unnoticed in most of the press,
with the exception of the Arkansas Democrat, whose
headline told the story: "Clinton has powerful
buddy in U.S.S.R – New head of KGB."

Estulin's book, first written in 2005 in Spain, has been
translated into 24 languages, most recently this English
He has covered the Bilderberg Group as a
journalist for more than 15 years.

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Why Is the White race so suicidal ?

As In my previous post where I got a little angry, this
Is some more sheer stupidity to get me going. Why are
Whites so suicidal In terms of Race and Nation ? Why
do they go merrily along with the NWO freaks towards
their ultimate demise. Are they that afraid of resisting
and being called "Racist" or "Anti-Semetic" ???

It seems White "Leaders" are so happy to screw
over their people and Nations to appease
foreigners. While no non-White Nation shares
this suicidal tendency. If the NWO program
of Diversity Is so great, Why does It always
seek to Inspire guilt and shame, While
Inciting hatreds amongst all the races ?

Christmas should be

'downgraded' to help race

relations says Labour think tank

By JAMES CHAPMAN - More by this author »
Last updated at 12:56pm on 1st November 2007

Comments Comments (85)

Christmas should be downgraded in favour of festivals from
other religions to improve race relations, says an explosive report.

Labour's favourite think-tank says that because it would be
hard to "expunge" Christmas from the national
(Basically showing how the NWO would like to
eventually do away with Christianity)
, 'even-handedness'
means public organisations must start giving other
religions equal footing.

The leaked findings of its investigation into identity,
citizenship and community cohesion also propose:

• "Birth ceremonies", at which state
and parents agree to "work in partnership"
to bring up children (Meaning your children
are property of the State)

• Action to "ensure access" for ethnic
minorities to "largely white"
countryside (Using Minorities as a cover
to destroy any sense of Nationhood or
Ethnic unity)

• An overhaul of Britain's "imperial"honours system

• Bishops being thrown out of the House
of Lords (A blatant attack on Religion)

• An end to "sectarian" religious
education (Another attack on Religion)

• Flying flags other than the Union
Jack. ( Why not the U.N. NWO Flag ?)

Scroll down for more ...

Nativity scene

Nativity scene: Christian celebrations in schools could become a thing of the past

The report by the Institute for Public Policy Research was
commissioned when Nick Pearce, now head of public policy
at Downing Street, was its director.

IPPR has shaped many Labour policies, including ID
cards, bin taxes and road pricing.

The report robustly defends multiculturalism - the idea
that different communities should not be forced
to integrate
but should be allowed to maintain
their own culture and
identities.(This worked out
lovely In Yugoslavia, Resulting In a brutal
Ethnic war from ethnic enclaves , Also notice
how this contradicts with their proposal
that -
minorities to be "Ensured access" to
the"largely white"
countryside.That Is
forcing Diversity and
Multiculturalism, Not
making It voluntary ! More Orwellian
doublespeak from the State)

And it says immigrants should be required to acquire some
proficiency in English and other aspects of British culture
"if - but only if - the settled population is willing
to open up
national institutions and practices to
newcomers and give
a more inclusive cast to
national narratives and symbols".(Again the
Native population Is being defamed as "Racist"

and close minded, Does this tactic ever get old ??!!)

It adds: "Even-handedness dictates that we provide
public recognition to minority cultures and traditions.

"If we are going to continue as a nation to mark Christmas -
and it would be very hard to expunge it from our national
life even if we wanted to - then public organisations should
mark other religious festivals too. (Why don't you Satanic
NWO freaks just come out and say It. You want
gone, So we can adopt your sick
Immoral Religion of the flesh
and materialistic
worship of self )

"We can no longer define ourselves as a Christian nation, nor
an especially religious one in any sense. ( See here the
make It clear)

"The empire is gone, church attendance is at historically
low levels, and the Second World War is inexorably
slipping from memory."(Why because the almighty
State officials says so. So the people of Britain
renounce their history and faith!)

Scarborough Christmas lights

National celebration: But could Christmas soon be 'downgraded'?

The report, written by IPPR advisers Ben Rogers and Rick
Muir, calls on Ministers to launch an "urgent and upfront
campaign" promoting a "multicultural understanding
of Britishness". (I'm sure It would be easy to define
Britishness If the Satate stopped Fucking with the
culture In It's social engineering schemes)

"Multiculturalism can be shown to provide for a fairer
and more liberal society and does not necessarily lead
to social division and community conflict, as its critics
have claimed," it says. (Study the History of multi-
ethnic States, They are far from harmonious- Look
at Iraq or the Balkans for recent examples.)

Councils must act to "ensure children mix and are
able to form friendships with pupils from different
backgrounds". (Forcing people to Intermingle
creates resentment, Why not let them do It
on their own If they so choose?)

The report adds: "Any liberal state should recast the civic
oaths and national ceremonies, or institutions like
Parliament and the monarchy, in a more multi-religious
or secular form and make religious education less sectarian."

The presence of bishops in the House of Lords, for
instance, is condemned as an "anachronism" that
should be removed. (Why I thought you want
Multi-Religions, I see only Christianity Is
to be forbidden)

The system in which parents are required to register
a new baby at a register office is dismissed as
"purely bureaucratic".

The occasion should be transformed into a
"public rite", using citizenship ceremonies for
immigrants as a model, the report says.

"Parents, their friends and family and the state
[would] agree to work in partnership to support
and bring up their child."(Orwells State Is
becoming more and more a reality)

Rural Britain, the report complains, "remains
a largely white place". (And Britain was
all White for thousands of years, And It Is a
problem how. See the NWO seeks to destroy
ethnic unity and kinship, Under the guise
of Inclusion and diversity)

Much more needs to be done to "ensure access" to
the countryside for black and ethnic minority
groups, disabled people and children from
inner-city areas. (Was anybody denied access
before now ? No, you are trying to force
Balkinization and spite Ethnic turmoils.)

Sayeeda Warsi, the Conservative spokesman on community
cohesion, said: "Their comments betray a breathtaking
misunderstanding of what it is to be British. These proposals
could actually damage cohesion."

She added: "You don't build community cohesion by
throwing out our history and denying the fundamental
contribution Christianity has played and does play
to our nation.

"As a British Muslim I can see that - so why
others can't just staggers me."

And she attacked ceremonies to mark the
registration of a baby.

"The thought of Gordon Brown sharing responsibility
with me for bringing up my children sends a shiver
down my spine. I thought we got rid of communism?"

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

More Idiocy from American "Higher Education".

University to students: 'All whites are racist'
Mandatory program 'treats' politically incorrect attitudes

Posted: October 30, 2007
9:35 p.m. Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2007

A mandatory University of Delaware program requires residence
hall students to acknowledge that "all whites are racist" and offers
them "treatment" for any incorrect attitudes regarding class, gender,
religion, culture or sexuality they might hold upon entering the
school, according to a civil rights group.

"Somehow, the University of Delaware seems terrifyingly unaware
that a state-sponsored institution of higher education in the United
States does not have the legal right to engage in a program of
systematic thought reform. The First Amendment protects the
right to freedom of conscience – the right to keep our innermost
thoughts free from governmental intrusion. It also protects the
right to be free from compelled speech," said a letter from
Samantha Harris, director of legal and public advocacy for
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education to university
President Patrick Harker.

The organization cited excerpts from the university's Office
of Residence Life Diversity Education Training documents,
including the statement:

"A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized
on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. 'The
term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent)
living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion,
culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be
racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not
have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or
acts of discrimination�.'"

The education program also notes that "reverse racism" is "a
term created and used by white people to deny their white
privilege." And "a non-racist" is called "a non-term," because,
the program explains, "The term was created by whites to
deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura
of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift the
responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of
color (called 'blaming the victim')."

The "education" regarding racism is just one of the subjects
that students are required to adopt as part of their University
of Delaware experience, too, FIRE noted.

The "shocking program of ideological reeducation," which
the school itself defines as a "treatment" for students' incorrect
attitudes and beliefs, is nothing less than "Orwellian," FIRE said.

The school requires its approximately 7,000 residence hall
students "to adopt highly specific university-approved views
on issues ranging from politics to race, sexuality, sociology,
moral philosophy and environmentalism."

"FIRE is calling for the total dismantling of the program,
which is a flagrant violation of students' rights to freedom
of conscience and freedom from compelled speech," the
organization said.

On a foundation blog, a student noted that one residence
assistant told students, "Not to scare anyone or anything, but
these are MANDATORY!!" And the training program for
those who indoctrinate students includes the order: "A
researcher must document that the treatment/intervention
was faithfully applied (ex: specific lesson plans were
delivered to every student, etc.)."

Further, the school requires "a systemic change" as a result
of the program, FIRE noted. As one RA told students: "Like
it or not, you all are the future Leaders, and the world is
Diverse, so learning to Embrace and Appreciate that
diversity is ESSENTIAL."

"The University of Delaware's residence life education
program is a grave intrusion into students' private beliefs,
" FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said. "The university has
decided that it is not enough to expose its students to the
values it considers important; instead, it must coerce its
students into accepting those values as their own. At a
public university like Delaware, this is both unconscionable
and unconstitutional."

According to university materials, RAs are instructed to
ask students during one-on-one sessions questions such
as: "When did you discover your sexual identity?" "When
were you first made aware of your race?" and "Who taught
you a lesson in regard to some sort of diversity
awarness? What was the lesson?"

"Students who express discomfort with this type of questioning
often meet with disapproval from their RAs, who write reports
on these one-on-one sessions and deliver these reports to their
superiors. One student identified in a write-up as an RA's 'worst'
one-on-one session was a young woman who stated that she was
tired of having 'diversity shoved down her throat,'" FIRE said.

This particular student responded to the question, "When did
you discover your sexual identity?" with the terse: "That is
none of your damn business," FIRE said.

Requirements for students include: "Students will recognize
that systemic oppression exists in our society," "Students will
recognize the benefits of dismantling systems of oppression,
" and "Students will be able to utilize their knowledge of
sustainability to change their daily habits and consumer
mentality," FIRE said.

The foundation said students even are "pressured or even
required" to make social statements that meet with the
school's approval.

"The fact that the university views its students as patients
in need of treatment for some sort of moral sickness betrays
a total lack of respect not only for students' basic rights, but
for students themselves," Lukianoff said. "The University of
Delaware has both a legal and a moral obligation to
immediately dismantle this program, and FIRE will not rest
until it has."

A spokesman for the school, contacted by WND, said he was
not ready to make a statement about the situation right away.

But the foundation's letter to Harker noted, "we have never
encountered a more systematic assault upon the individual
liberty, dignity, privacy, and autonomy of university students
than this program," which "requires students to adopt highly
specific university-approved views on issues."

"Such utter contempt for the autonomy and free agency of
others is the hallmark of totalitarianism and has no place in
any free society, let alone at a public university in the state
of Delaware," the letter said.

Especially alarming, Harris told WND, is that the school defines
learning specifically as "attitudinal or behavioral changes," not
acquiring any sort of knowledge and ability.

Such thinking "represents a distorted idea of 'education' that
one would more easily associate with a Soviet prison camp than
with an American institution of higher education," FIRE said. "As
another example, after an investigation showed that males
demonstrated 'a higher degree of resistance to educational
efforts,' the Rodney complex chose to hire 'strong male
RAs.' Each such RA 'combats male residents' concepts of
traditional male identity,' in order to 'ensure the delivery
of the curriculum at the same level as in the female
floors.' This language is disturbingly reminiscent of a pivotal
scene from George Orwell's '1984,' in which the protagonist's
captors tell him that 'The Party is not interested in the overt
act: the thought is all we care about. We do not merely
destroy our enemies, we change them.'"

No small danger, FIRE noted, is being presented to the
university through such apparent constitutional
violations. "Simply put, the residence life education
program is a legal minefield," the group said.

One student reacted to the indoctrination with
rebellion. On the FIRE blog, he wrote:

"Take the issue of homosexuality, and the rights that should
or should not be associated with it. As a Christian, I believe
that the Bible says homosexuality is wrong, and is a sin
against God. As such, I cannot accept it as a legitimate
lifestyle. While I accept homosexuals as people, I do
not accept their choice as right, and subsequently I do
not think that homosexual couples should be given
marital rights. I accept that others do not hold the
same views as me. But it is wrong that under the
Residence Life curriculum and school mandated
curriculum that I should made to feel guilty for my
views. � It is not the school's right to try to convince
me to embrace the values that Residence Life has
chosen. Essentially, if I do not change my views, I
will be labeled by my RA as not embracing
diversity, and not accepting of certain groups, and
thus my RA will try all the harder to change me. This
is not the school's job, or right."

by KmHarrison on 10/31/2007
There was a poll done (2002-3?) among young people in which two
magazines, a women's and a teens, cooperated to see where
racism is found. The expected result would show that white
young (13-21) people were the most racist. The actual
results, hidden in the back pages of both
magazines, were that blacks were the most racist
group! The university needs to get back to reality.

by RaMu51 1 hour ago
They are trying to indoctrinate the kids so they will bow
to the New World Order.

by ryhmerock 36 minutes ago
This is nothing but an assault on the very soul of these
students. Brave New World, the USSR ... take your
pick. Those of us who understand the seriousness of this
matter and the vileness of this evil, must fight it ! All
7,000 dorm students have every right to sue those
those oppressive thought Nazis and I hope they do. I'm
live in this jackass donkey blue state but my state rep is
an exception to the rule. I'm going to contact him and
demand that the state governemtn cut funding to these
petty tyrants until they cease forcing their perverted,
america hating, commie, enviro-retard attitude upon
these young men and women. This is suppossed to
be an education it's a fraud !

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you ! It appears not all
Americans are fooled by the leftist race hucksters. The
black race Is the most racist and hateful towards
whites. But our leftist news media portrays
the opposite. White youth are bombarded with
"white guilt" and the belief that pride In their
European heritage Is racist. Meanwhile the
news media sits Idle as Whites are attacked
by Blacks In "Hush Crimes", But will jump
right away on the less common White on
Black crime. If they keep excusing the
fact that Blacks get away with racially
Insulting and attacking Whites, they
will create a violent racial backlash In
the near future. But those who know the
Elitists plan, know that they relish a
race war. Diversity Is a sham, It brings
Incompatible cultures to America. It
brings cultures to America who are
hostile to us and each other. And It
Is Anti-White as It cheers on a perceived
White demise In the future. But this Is
what the corrupt elites desire. It Is
easier to despotically rule over a third
world nation of divided, squabbling
ethnicity's. Than a Nation of a united
homogeneous people, unity brings
strength. When everyone Is fighting
amongst each other for survival. Who
Is watching the Elites In power ?

For the day when they try to disarm the populace !

By Odessa

Don't believe all of the political bullshit from our sensationalist
"Elected Leaders", Media or their Police enforcers about guns. They
want to scare the morons Into believing guns are evil and must be
done away with. Well do these Idiots really believe criminals will
magically decide to go along with the law the day comes to surrender
arms ???!!!! Gee who the hell uses guns to commit crime anyway-
Criminals, But common sense Is lost on American politicians. Only
law abiding (And Idiotic to follow this State decree) will.

I along with countless others will not ever surrender our right to
self defense to the State, Or become the prey of armed criminals
or Police State thugs.

Most gun related crime Is due to Gangs mostly from Inner
cities, And some cases from disturbed people who go on
shooting rampages.

Yet these Idiots portray every gun owner as a crazed killer
willing and ready to strike. They gleefully enjoy and sensationalize
every mass murder with firearms. They glorify spree killers
most of whom are on some kind of Anti-Psychotic or Anti-
depressant drugs, Yet we never hear them explore that
fact. Did the "Prescription drugs" Influence their behavior
or were they just disturbed that bad already ? Because I
find It Interesting that every school shooter was doped
up on some big pharma pill. but do we go after big
pharma ? Fuck no ! Washington doesn't really want
to lose campaign $.

And most of these Individuals would have If they were
that hellbent could murder with another object. A screwdriver,
a knife or a fucking crossbow. Are we going to ban all sharp
objects or anything flammable too ?

Explosives are banned, yet the Columbine weirdos made some
to bring along. What would have happened had some teacher
been armed ? Kids could have been possibly saved and the
weirdos dead, Instead we had two weirdos shooting
helpless prey, And receiving media glory after the fact.

Why doesn't anybody question the medias role In all
of this ? They have made the Columbine weirdos Idols
to every mentally disturbed youth In America. But
that Is what the media hoped for, By creating Icons
of these two rejects. They hope more will follow and the
American people will be conditioned to surrender their
firearms. I sincerely hope that people will see through
this ploy, but the way Americans are becoming
lemmings It's frightening !

Think about It, Politicians want to ban guns. Yet they
are protected by armed bodyguards. I guess guns aren't
so evil after all. Only when the populace Is armed and
capable of resistance to their schemes Is It a problem.

Look at Australia or England where firearms were
banned. Crime went through the roof, As criminals were
the only ones armed. I wonder If they feel safer now ?

Here are some plans for guns, for the day the State
attempts disarming the citizenry.


The whole firearm was constructed by hand from steel tubing, shaft lock collars and a few nuts and bolts!


Weapon Type - Machine Pistol
Action - Open bolt fully automatic
Calibre - .32/.380
Capacity - 16/14
OAL - 18 ¾
Barrel Length - 9"
Weight unloaded - 4lbs 9oz
Sights - None
Safety - None
Construction materials - Tube, Collars, Nuts and Bolts
Material availability - Good
Tools required - Hand only

Purpose - Home underground manufacture for defence and resistance

Opposite you can see a schematic diagram of the machine gun.

Please click the picture to zoom in.


The tube sizes shown below are those required to construct the major component parts for the expedient machine pistol, i.e. receivers, barrel, magazine and breech block etc.

1. 30x30x2mm UPPER RECEIVER
2. 30x30x1.6mm LOWER RECEIVER
3. 25.40x12.70x1.6mm + 12.70x0.91mm MAGAZINE
4. 14.29x3.25mm BARREL
5. 12.70x2.03mm BREECH BLOCK
6. 15.88x34.93x1.6mm MAGAZINE WELL
7. 40x20x1.6mm GRIP
8. 50.80x1.6mm TRIGGER GUARD

The ERW (Electric Resistance Welded) tubing
is very useful for the construction of receivers
and magazine, or as sleeving to reinforce or
increase the diameter of another tube. It
should not be used as gun barrelling - unless
nothing else is available - due to its welded-
seam construction. The SMT (Seemless
Mechanical Tube) is ideal for improvised
gun barrels. Because of the many different
tube sizes available, it is possible to construct
a barrel to suit almost any calibre of
firearm. Where possible, heavy-gauge
tube should be used for barrel or a lighter
gauge suitably reinforced with a second tube
or steel collars. While many tubes will be of
perfectly adequate strength on their own, it
is only common sense to make the tube as
strong as possible, providing the design
of the gun will allow it.

9mm Machine Pistol (file size is 3,913,078-bytes)
Receiver 3D Drawing (file size is 105,693-bytes)
9mm MP Schematic (file size is 148,706-bytes)

A simple "Zip Gun" design


Educate Yourself

The American Police State !



By: Tom Rose

A concerned reader who has been attentively observing the "signs
of the times" makes a thoughtful comment and poses some
pertinent questions:

It appears that our police forces in America are changing and
that we are developing into a Police State/Surveillance
Society. What is the traditional model for police forces in
America? Are they in the process of being militarized? If
so, for what reason? How can we reconstruct the
American concept of police?

The answer is yes. The orientation and underlying concept of
police enforcement in America have, indeed, been changing,
but changing so quietly as to be hardly noticeable except by
a few careful observers. The traditional orientation of police
enforcement has been local rather than national. It was the
sheriff, the highest police official in the county, and his
deputies who were unquestioningly in control of maintaining
peace and apprehending law breakers.

Incorporated cities and municipalities have the same local
orientation, but the titles change to chief of police and
policemen on the beat. The general concept used to be
that law enforcement was applied by the sheriff’s deputy
or policeman on the beat right where problems occurred. This
historic view has changed because of political pressures
and monetary influences from the national level of
. But even now the sheriff, as the highest-
ranking police officer in the county, still has authority to tell
federal agencies and their SWAT teams (FBI, BATF, DEA,
IRS, and federal marshals) how they must conduct themselves
in his county. Sadly, very few sheriffs have the intestinal fortitude
to buck the evolving national-statist system because doing so
might threaten their careers or their standing with federal
agencies on whom they have become financially dependent.

In recent years in America, black-masked government
SWAT teams ( also paid thugs) have increasingly
appeared on the scene (BATF, FBI, DEA, federal
marshals, and joint-task forces). Today, only the
unaware feel safe.

Some very keen observers and excellent students of
history regard the so-called "terrorist attack" of 9/11,
and Hurricane Katrina with its disturbing aftermath, as
likely "putsches" meant to generate chaos for justifying
the imposition of Martial Law, the disarming of Americans,
and the birth of a full-blown Police State in America.

A frightening thought? Certainly! But take heed to a timely
warning: As I carefully watch the outworking of both 9/11 and
Hurricane Katrina, I see too many signs that Americans
are being psychologically conditioned to accept a
Police State!
The growing use of masked government SWAT
teams is an early warning signal of the erection of a Police
State designed to rule over a frightened and compliant
citizenry who have been conditioned to value the illusory
promise of "security from terrorism" more than liberty and
individual self-responsibility. The irony is that the so-called
"terrorists" against whom we are to be protected are more
likely to be found within our own government than in
foreign countries!

Full Article:

Why Americans are so easily controlled and misled.

Why Americans Will

Believe Almost Anything

By Tim O'Shea
Aldous Huxley's inspired 1954 essay detailed the vivid,
mind-expanding, multisensory insights of his mescaline
adventures. By altering his brain chemistry with natural
psychotropics, Huxley tapped into a rich and fluid world
of shimmering, indescribable beauty and power. With
his neurosensory input thus triggered, Huxley was able
to enter that parallel universe described by every mystic
and space captain in recorded history. Whether by
hallucination or epiphany, Huxley sought to remove all
bonds, all controls, all filters, all cultural conditioning
from his perceptions and to confront Nature or the World
or Reality first-hand - in its unpasteurized, unedited,
unretouched infinite rawness.

Those bonds are much harder to break today, half a century
later. We are the most conditioned, programmed beings the
world has ever known. Not only are our thoughts and attitudes
continually being shaped and molded; our very awareness of
the whole design seems like it is being subtly and inexorably
erased. The doors of our perception are carefully and precisely
regulated. Who cares, right?

It is an exhausting and endless task to keep explaining to
people how most issues of conventional wisdom are
scientifically implanted in the public consciousness by
a thousand media clips per day. In an effort to save time,
I would like to provide just a little background on the handling
of information in this country. Once the basic principles are
illustrated about how our current system of media control
arose historically, the reader might be more apt to question
any given story in today's news.

If everybody believes something, it's probably wrong.
We call that


In America, conventional wisdom that has mass acceptance
is usually contrived: somebody paid for it. Examples:

Pharmaceuticals restore health

Vaccination brings immunity

The cure for cancer is just around the corner

Menopause is a disease condition

When a child is sick, he needs immediate antibiotics

When a child has a fever he needs Tylenol

Hospitals are safe and clean.

America has the best health care in the world.

Americans have the best health in the world.

Milk is a good source of calcium.

You never outgrow your need for milk.

Vitamin C is ascorbic acid.

Aspirin prevents heart attacks.

Heart drugs improve the heart.

Back and neck pain are the only reasons for
spinal adjustment.

No child can get into school without being vaccinated.

The FDA thoroughly tests all drugs before they go
on the market.

Pregnancy is a serious medical condition

Infancy is a serious medical condition

Chemotherapy and radiation are effective cures
for cancer

When your child is diagnosed with an ear infection,
antibiotics should be given immediately 'just in case'

Ear tubes are for the good of the child.

Estrogen drugs prevent osteoporosis after menopause.

Pediatricians are the most highly trained of all
medical specialists.

The purpose of the health care industry is health.

HIV is the cause of AIDS.

AZT is the cure.

Without vaccines, infectious diseases will return

Fluoride in the city water protects your teeth

Flu shots prevent the flu.

Vaccines are thoroughly tested before being
placed on the Mandated Schedule.

Doctors are certain that the benefits of vaccines far
outweigh any possible risks.

There is a terrorist threat in the US.

There is a bioterrorist threat in the US.

The NASDAQ is a natural market controlled by
supply and demand.

Chronic pain is a natural consequence of aging.

Soy is your healthiest source of protein.

Insulin shots cure diabetes.

After we take out your gall bladder you can eat
anything you want

Allergy medicine will cure allergies.

An airliner can be flown with professional precision by
a group of crazed amateurs into a 100-story building
and can cause that building to collapse on its own
footprint. Twice.

The Iraqis blew up the World Trade Center.

This is a list of illusions, that have cost billions to conjure
up. Did you ever wonder why most people in this country
generally accept most of the above statements?


Even the most undiscriminating viewer may suspect that
TV newsreaders and news articles are not telling us the
whole story. The slightly more lucid may have begun to
glimpse the calculated intent of standard news content
and are wondering about the reliability and accuracy of
the way events are presented. For the very few who take
time to research beneath the surface of the daily
programming and who are still capable of independent
thought, a somewhat darker picture begins to
emerge. These may perceive bits of evidence of the
profoundly technical science behind much of what is
served up in mass media.

Events taking place in today's world are enormously
complex. An impossibly convoluted tangle of
interrelated and unrelated occurrences happens
simultaneously, often in dynamic conflict. To even
acknowledge this complexity contradicts a
fundamental axiom of media science: Keep It Simple.

In real life, events don't take place in black and
white, but in a thousand shades of grey. Just
discovering the actual facts and events as they
transpire is difficult enough. The river is different
each time we step into it. By the time a reasonable
understanding of an event has been apprehended,
new events have already made that interpretation
obsolete. And this is not even adding historical,
social, or political elements into the mix, which
are necessary for interpretation of events. Popular
media gives up long before this level of analysis.

Media stories cover only the tiniest fraction of
actual events, but stupidly claim to be summarizing
"all the news."

The final goal of media is to create a following of
docile, unquestioning consumers. To that end, three
primary tools have historically been employed:


Over time, the sophistication of these tools of
propaganda has evolved to a very structured science,
taking its cues in an unbroken line from principles
laid down by the Father of Spin himself, Edward L
Bernays, over a century ago, as we will see.

Let's look at each tool very briefly:


Deliberate misrepresentation of fact has always been
the privilege of the directors of mass media. Their
agents - the PR industry - cannot afford random
objective journalism interpreting events as they
actually take place. This would be much too
confusing for the average consumer, who has
been spoonfed his opinions since the day he was
born. No, we can't have that. In all the confusion
the viewer might get the idea that he is supposed
to make up his own mind about the significance
of some event or other. The end product of good
media is single-mindedness. Confusion and
individual interpretation of events do not foster
the homogenized, one-dimensional
lemming outlook.

For this reason, events must have a spin put on
them - an interpretation, a frame of
reference. Subtleties are omitted; all that is
presented is the bottom line. The minute that
decision is made - what spin to put on a story -
we have left the world of reporting and entered
the world of propaganda. By definition, propaganda
replaces faithful reporting with deceitful reporting.

Here's an obvious example: the absurd and
unremitting allegations of Saddam's weapons
of mass destruction as a rationale for the invasion
of Iraq. Of course none were ever found, but that
is irrelevant. We weren't really looking for any
weapons - but the deceit served its purpose -
get us in there. Later the ruse can be abandoned
and forgotten; its usefulness is over. And nobody
will notice. Characterization of Saddam as a
murderous tyrant was decided to be an
insufficient excuse for invading a sovereign
nation. After all, there are literally dozens of
murderous tyrants the world over, going their
merry ways. We can't be expected to police
all of them.

So it was decided that the murderous tyrant
thing, though good, was not enough. To whip
a sleeping people into war consciousness has
historically involved one additional prerequisite:
threat. Saddam must therefore be not only a baby-
killing maniac; he must be a threat to the rest of
the world, especially America. Why? Because he
has weapons of mass destruction. For almost two
years, this myth was assiduously programmed into
the lowest common denominator of awareness
which Americans substitute for consciousness. Even
though the myth has now been openly dismissed
by the Regime itself, the majority of us still believe it.

Hitler used the exact same tack with the Czechs and
Poles at the beginning of his rampage. These peaceful
peoples were not portrayed as an easy mark for the
German war machine - no, they were a threat to the
Fatherland itself. Just like Albania in the Dustin
Hoffman movie. And threats must be removed
by all available force.

With Iraq, the fact that UN inspectors never came
up with any of these dread weapons before
Saddam was captured - this fact was never mentioned
again. That one phrase - WMD WMD WMD -
repeated ad nauseam month after month had served
its purpose - whip the people into war mode. It
didn't have to be true; it just had to work. A
staggering indicator of how low the general
awareness had sunk is that this mantra
continued to be used as our license to invade
Iraq long after our initial assault. If Saddam had
any such weapons, probably a good time to trot
them out would be when a foreign country is
moving in, wouldn't you say?

No weapons were ever found, nor will they be. So
confident was the PR machine in the general
inattention to detail commonly exhibited by the
comatose American people that they didn't even
find it necessary to plant a few mass weapons in
order to justify the invasion. It was almost insulting.

So we see that a little deceit goes a long way. All
it takes is repetition. Lay the groundwork and the
people will buy anything. After that just ride it out
until they seem doubtful again. Then onto
the next deceit.


A second tool that is commonly used to create mass
intellectual torpor is dissimulation. Dissimulation
simply means to pretend not to be something you
are. Like some insects who can disguise themselves
as leaves or twigs, pretending not to be insects. Or
bureaucrats who pretend not to be acting in their own
interest, but rather in the public interest. To pretend not
to be what you are.

Whether it's the Bush league in Iraq or Hitler in
Germany, aggressors do not present themselves as
marauding invaders initiating hostilities, but instead as
defenders against external threats.

Freedom-annihilating edicts like the Homeland
Security Act and the Patriot Act - currently the law of
the land - do not represent themselves as the negation
of every principle the Founding Fathers laid down,
or as shaky pretexts for the Takers to further loot the
country, but rather as public services, benevolent and
necessary new rules to ensure our SECURITY against
various imagined enemies. To pretend to be what you
are not: dissimulation.

Other obvious examples of dissimulation we see
today include:

pretending like the world's oil will not be gone in 35 years

pretending like more and more government will not
further stifle an already struggling economy

pretending like programs favoring "minorities" are not
just another form of racism

pretending like drug laws are necessary for
national security

pretending like passing more and more laws every
year is not geared ultimately for the advancement
of the law enforcement, security, and prison industries

pretending there is a bioterrorist threat in the US today

pretending there is a terrorist threat in the US today

pretending the Bush regime has not benefited from
every program that came out of 9/11

To pretend to be what you are not: dissimulation.


A third tool necessary to media in order to keep the
public from thinking too much is distraction. Bread
and circuses worked for Caesar in old Rome. The
people need to be kept quiet while the small group
in power carries out its agenda, which always involves
fortifying its own position.

All actions of the present Reich since 9/11 may be
explained by plugging in one of four beneficiaries:

War gear
Security systems

Every act, every political event, every public statement
of the present administration has promoted one or more
of these huge sectors. More oil, more drugs, more
weapons, more security.

But the people mustn't be allowed to notice things
like that. So they must be smokescreened by other
stuff , blatant obvious stuff which is really easy to
understand and which they think has a greater
bearing on their day to day life. A classic axiom
of propaganda is that people shouldn't be allowed
to think too much about what the government is
doing in their name. After all, there's more to life
than politics, right? So while the power group has
its cozy little war going on, the people need to have
their attention diverted.

All the strong men of history would have given
their eyeteeth to have at their disposal the number
and types of distractions available to today's regimes:

- TV sports, its orchestrated frenzy and spectacle

- Super Sunday

- an endless succession of unspeakably boring,
inane movies, short on plot, long on CGI

- the wanton sexless flash of MTV with its uninspired
lack of talent, a study in split second phony images

- colossally dull TV programs which serve the
secondary purpose of instilling proper robot
attitudes into people who have little other instruction
in life values

- the artistic Mojave of modern music, with its
soulless cyber-droning, a constant quest for the
nadir of reptilian brain stimulation, devoid of
lyrical competence, instrumental proficiency,
or passion

- the ever-retreating promise of financial success,
switched now to the trappings and toys that suggest
success, available to anyone with a credit card

- organized superstitions of all varieties, with their
requisite pseudo-spiritual trappings

- the constant dramatization of crimes and
"issues" throughout the world whose collective
goal is the humble and grateful acknowledgement
of "how good we've really got it"

- dwelling for months on the minutiae of
unsupported allegations of impropriety,
preferably sexual, of a celebrity personality

With these noisy, banal distractions the forces
promoting the general decline in intelligence
and awareness jubilantly engulf us on all
sides. Media science holds the advantage: as
people get dumber and dumber year by year it
gets easier and easier to keep them dumb. The only
challenge is that their threshold keeps getting
lower. So in order to keep their attention, messages
have to become more obvious and blatant,
taking nothing for granted.

For the full article here Is the link: